H. Morrison
What is a Psychological Task? The Operational Pliability of “Task” in Psychological Laboratory Experimentation
Morrison, H.; McBriar, S.; Powell, H.; Proudfoot, J.; Stanley, S.; Fitzgerald, D.; Callard, F.
Authors
S. McBriar
H. Powell
Dr Jesse Proudfoot jesse.proudfoot@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
S. Stanley
D. Fitzgerald
F. Callard
Abstract
There has been no sustained sociological analysis of a near ubiquitous feature of psychological laboratory experimentation: the task. Yet the task is central in arranging the means by which phenomena are isolated and brought into the experimental scientist’s purview. As scientific objects, states such as mind wandering and daydreaming have been made visible in experiments that draw on a (sometimes) sharp distinction between what it means to be either “on task” or “off task”––which entails a long history of what it means to have a subject attend to her task, a central aspect of the psychology experiment since its foundation. Through an analysis of qualitative interviews with research participants in studies of so-called “mind wandering,” it becomes clear that task is deployed and understood in multiple ways: it is often hard to distinguish when a person is on task and when they are not; when participants reflect on their own internal states the boundedness that the concept relies upon is drawn sharply into question; and the complex spatio-temporal organization of experiences of both mind wandering and task disrupts the metaphorical structures that the scientific literature has baked into these terms. The term “operational pliability” allows us to understand how the pliability of the practice and concept of task is central to how task functions. Operational pliability offers a way of understanding how particular elements in scientific investigation are easily adaptable and at the same time are able to hold some kind of shape or form.
Citation
Morrison, H., McBriar, S., Powell, H., Proudfoot, J., Stanley, S., Fitzgerald, D., & Callard, F. (2019). What is a Psychological Task? The Operational Pliability of “Task” in Psychological Laboratory Experimentation. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 5, 61-85. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2019.274
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 19, 2019 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Mar 22, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 26, 2019 |
Journal | Engaging Science, Technology, and Society |
Electronic ISSN | 2413-8053 |
Publisher | Society for Social Studies of Science |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 5 |
Pages | 61-85 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2019.274 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1300251 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(279 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2019 (Hazel Morrison, Shannon McBriar, Hilary Powell, Jesse Proudfoot, Steven Stanley, Des Fitzgerald,
Felicity Callard). Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd).
You might also like
The psychic life of gentrification: mapping desire and resentment in the gentrifying city
(2021)
Journal Article
The stakes of situated knowledges
(2019)
Journal Article
Traumatic landscapes: Two geographies of addiction
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search