Backwards time: Causal catachresis and its influence on viewpoint flow

Virdee, Douglass

Abstract

This paper proposes a cognitive linguistic explanation of the unusual narrative construal of time as moving backwards. It shows that backwards time in narrative involves setting up an alternative space in which a second narrative is constructed simultaneously, resulting in a viewpoint hierarchy which postulates four viewpoints on each discourse statement. The paper draws together research on conceptual metaphor, mental spaces theory and viewpoint multiplicity, bringing it to bear on discourse fragments. The majority of these are taken from Martin Amis’s Time’s Arrow (Amis, Martin. 2003 [1991]. Time’s Arrow. London: Vintage.) (a logically consistent and linguistically revealing text), but the discussion is contextualised with further examples. It is argued that the causal construal implied by narrative is not limited by our phenomenological experience, as other studies (e.g., Evans, Vyvyan. 2013. Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.) might suggest, but is instead prompted by conceptual re-interpretation of deictic markers in the discourse. The analysis focuses on causal construal, negation (especially causal catachresis), and alternativity. It shows how linguistic features at the sentential level generate top-down reorganization of both episodic structure and discourse meaning, and how this relies on multiplicity of viewpoint and a conceptual “zooming out” prompting the perception of irony.

Citation

Virdee, D. (2019). Backwards time: Causal catachresis and its influence on viewpoint flow. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(2), 417-438. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0040

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Online Publication Date: May 9, 2019
• Publication Date: May 9, 2019
• Deposit Date: Jun 26, 2019
• Publicly Available Date: May 9, 2020
• Journal: Cognitive Linguistics
• Print ISSN: 0936-5907
• Electronic ISSN: 1613-3641
• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 30
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 417-438
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0040
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1293374