Cycling into headwinds: analysing mobility practices that inhibit sustainability

Scheurendrand, K.; Parsons, E.; Cappellini, B.; Patterson, A.

Abstract

Using the example of cycling, the authors contribute to public policy debates surrounding sustainability. They employ practice theory to shift the debate away from consumer choice and agency to examine instead why sustainable practices are not always available to consumers. Therefore, rather than asking, “Why don’t people cycle?” the authors ask, “Why isn’t the practice of cycling thriving?” Practice theory focuses on material, meanings, and competences as the components of a practice, positing that a practice can thrive and grow only when these elements come together. By looking at how practices compete for the same set of elements, the authors demonstrate how some practices (e.g. driving, schooling, policing) come to dominate or inhibit others (i.e., cycling). In terms of the theme of this special issue, then, instead of excavating anticonsumption as a precursor to practices (i.e., a choice not to engage in those practices), by unpacking practices, the authors examine the mechanisms through which this choice is restricted.

Citation

Scheurendrand, K., Parsons, E., Cappellini, B., & Patterson, A. (2018). Cycling into headwinds: analysing mobility practices that inhibit sustainability. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618810440

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Mar 13, 2018
• Online Publication Date: Dec 12, 2018
• Publication Date: Nov 1, 2018
• Deposit Date: Nov 19, 2019
• Publicly Available Date: Nov 20, 2019
• Journal: Journal of public policy and marketing.
• Print ISSN: 0743-9156
• Electronic ISSN: 0743-9156
• Publisher: SAGE Publications
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 37
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 227-244
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618810440
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1283136