Raymond M. Duch
Nativist Policy: the comparative effects of Trumpian politics on migration decisions
Duch, Raymond M.; Laroze, Denise; Reinprecht, Constantin; Robinson, Thomas S.
Authors
Denise Laroze
Constantin Reinprecht
Thomas S. Robinson
Abstract
Firms in the USA rely on highly skilled immigrants, particularly in the science and engineering sectors. Yet, the recent politics of immigration marks a substantial change to US immigration policy. We implement a conjoint experiment that isolates the causal effect of nativist, anti-immigrant, pronouncements on where skilled potential-migrants choose to immigrate to. While these policies have a significantly negative effect on the destination choices of Chilean and UK student subjects, they have little effect on the choices of Indian and Chinese student subjects. These results are confirmed through an unobtrusive test of subjects’ general immigration destination preferences. Moreover, there is some evidence that the negative effect of these nativist policies are particularly salient for those who self-identify with the Left.
Citation
Duch, R. M., Laroze, D., Reinprecht, C., & Robinson, T. S. (2022). Nativist Policy: the comparative effects of Trumpian politics on migration decisions. Political Science Research and Methods, 10(1), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.33
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 29, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2022-01 |
Deposit Date | Sep 2, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 16, 2020 |
Journal | Political Science Research and Methods |
Print ISSN | 2049-8470 |
Electronic ISSN | 2049-8489 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 10 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 171-187 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.33 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1257223 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(412 Kb)
PDF
Accepted Journal Article
(1.7 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This article has been published in a revised form in Political science research and methods https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.33. This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed. © The European Political Science Association 2020.
You might also like
How Campaigns Respond to Ballot Position: A New Mechanism for Order Effects
(2022)
Journal Article
The MIDAS Touch: Accurate and Scalable Missing-Data Imputation with Deep Learning
(2021)
Journal Article
When Do Voters Respond to Campaign Finance Disclosure? Evidence from Multiple Election Types
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search