Leah Findlay l.j.findlay@durham.ac.uk
Honorary Fellow
Field guarding as a crop protection method: Preliminary implications for improving field guarding
Findlay, L.J.; Hill, R.A.
Authors
Professor Russell Hill r.a.hill@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Abstract
Negative interactions between crop farmers and wild primates are an issue of significant concern. Despite many crop farmers using field guards as a method of crop protection against foraging primates, there are very few published accounts of how effective this technique is and how it might be improved. To bridge this knowledge gap, we used direct observations from a hide to collect the behaviors of field guards, chacma baboons (Papio ursinus; baboons), and vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus; vervets) foraging in a 1-ha butternut squash (Cucurbita moschata) field for 4 months (May to August) in 2013 on a 564-ha commercial farm in the Blouberg District of South Africa. Only half of the crop-foraging events were chased by field guards, with vervets being chased much less frequently than baboons. Guards responded more often to events with greater primate numbers and to those that occurred earlier in the day. Guard delay in responding to crop-foraging events and baboon delay in responding to the guard both increased in the low productivity season. Baboon response delay also increased with more animals involved. Based on this case study, we suggest recommendations to improve the effectiveness of field guarding. This includes implementing an early warning alarm system, shortening field guard shifts, increasing guard numbers during the morning and low productivity season, and increasing the perceived fear of field guards, potentially by employing male guards or providing uniforms and deterrent accessories. Further evaluation in other local contexts will help determine how these findings can be adopted on a wider scale.
Citation
Findlay, L., & Hill, R. (2020). Field guarding as a crop protection method: Preliminary implications for improving field guarding. Human–Wildlife Interactions, 14(3), 519-530
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 2, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 25, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2020 |
Deposit Date | Dec 7, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 26, 2021 |
Journal | Human-wildlife interactions |
Print ISSN | 2155-3858 |
Electronic ISSN | 2155-3874 |
Publisher | Utah State University |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 14 |
Issue | 3 |
Article Number | 20 |
Pages | 519-530 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1249691 |
Publisher URL | https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol14/iss3/20 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(1.6 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
You might also like
Behavioural compatibility, not fear, best predicts the looking patterns of chacma baboons
(2024)
Journal Article
Leopard density and determinants of space use in a farming landscape in South Africa
(2024)
Journal Article
Tropical field stations yield high conservation return on investment
(2024)
Journal Article
Efficient data collection for camera trap‐based density estimation: A preliminary assessment
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search