M. Learmonth
‘Leadership’ as a Project: Neoliberalism and the Proliferation of ‘Leaders’
Learmonth, M.; Morrell, K.
Authors
K. Morrell
Abstract
It is increasingly common for anyone with formal, hierarchical status at work to be called a ‘leader’. Though widespread, this relatively recent change in day-to-day discourse is largely passing by unnoticed. We argue that using ‘leader’ in this way is not simply fashion or empty rhetoric; rather it can be understood in relation to neoliberalism. We argue that the language of ‘leadership’ represents a particularly subtle but powerful opportunity for the pursuit of individual elite interests to be disguised so that it look as if it is for the benefit of all. This opportunity has arisen because using ‘leader’ has tangible effects that reinforce implied values and assumptions about human relationships at work. In terms of implied values, the label ‘leader’ is celebratory and predisposes us to see elites in overly positive ways. In terms of implied assumptions, referring to executives as ‘leaders’ draws a veil over the structured antagonism at the heart of the employment relationship and wider sources of inequality by celebrating market values. Making ‘leadership’ recognizable as a political project is not intended primarily to suggest intentionality, but to help challenge representational practices that are becoming dominant. ‘Project-ing’ leadership also helps us to emphasize the risks inherent in taking this label for granted; which, we argue, is an important contribution because the language of leadership is increasingly used but is hardly questioned within much contemporary organizational life as well as organization theory.
Citation
Learmonth, M., & Morrell, K. (2021). ‘Leadership’ as a Project: Neoliberalism and the Proliferation of ‘Leaders’. Organization Theory, 2(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211036708
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 20, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 9, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2021-10 |
Deposit Date | Apr 21, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 22, 2021 |
Journal | Organization Theory |
Electronic ISSN | 2631-7877 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 2 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 1-19 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211036708 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1249586 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(176 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Accepted Journal Article
(368 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which
permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work
is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
You might also like
Media Review: Leadership, gender and ethics: Embodied reason in challenging masculinities
(2021)
Journal Article
Autoethnography
(2021)
Book Chapter
Reading for interest
(2020)
Journal Article
Fiction and the identity of the manager.
(2020)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search