P. Knapp
Evaluating the use of multimedia information when recruiting adolescents to orthodontics research: a randomised controlled trial
Knapp, P.; Mandall, N.; Hulse, W.; Roche, J.; Moe-Byrne, T.; Martin-Kerry, J.; Sheridan, R.; Higgins, S.
Authors
N. Mandall
W. Hulse
J. Roche
T. Moe-Byrne
J. Martin-Kerry
R. Sheridan
Professor Steven Higgins s.e.higgins@durham.ac.uk
Emeritus Professor
Abstract
Objective: The study aim was to compare two methods of providing information about the BAMP (Bone Anchored Maxillary Protraction) trial: standard printed information and multimedia websites, for their quality and ease of understanding, and impact on decision-making. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Orthodontic out-patient clinic in the UK. Methods: Participants were 109 adolescents (aged 11-14) attending for orthodontic treatment. While awaiting treatment they were asked to imagine being recruited to the BAMP clinical trial. They were individually randomised to receive the printed or the multimedia website information (comprising text, animations and ‘talking head’ videos). After reading or viewing the information, they completing a 9-item Likert scale Decision-Making Questionnaire (DMQ) (score range 0-36) plus 3 free text questions on their evaluation of the information. Results: 104 participants completed the questionnaire. Mean total DMQ scores were higher (more positive) in the website group (28.1 versus 27.0), although the difference was small and not statistically significant (p=0.20). Analysis of individual questionnaire items showed two statistically significant differences: the website information had higher ratings on ‘easy to understand’ (Z=3.03; p=.003) and ‘confidence in decision-making’ (Z=2.00; p=.044). On the three free text questions more positive and fewer negative comments were made about the websites than the printed information. Conclusions: In this hypothetical trial setting adolescent patients found that trial information conveyed on a multimedia website was easier to understand and made them more confident in their decision about trial participation. Their subjective evaluations of the website were also more positive and less negative than about the printed information. Multimedia information has potential to increase the quality of engagement and information exchange when seeking consent for research.
Citation
Knapp, P., Mandall, N., Hulse, W., Roche, J., Moe-Byrne, T., Martin-Kerry, J., Sheridan, R., & Higgins, S. (2021). Evaluating the use of multimedia information when recruiting adolescents to orthodontics research: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Orthodontics, 48(4), 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125211024250
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 22, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 6, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2021-12 |
Deposit Date | Jun 18, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 21, 2021 |
Journal | Journal of Orthodontics |
Print ISSN | 1465-3125 |
Electronic ISSN | 1465-3133 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 48 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 343-351 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125211024250 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1246925 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(281 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Accepted Journal Article
(381 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
You might also like
Improving power calculations in educational trials
(2023)
Report
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search