Luke L. Powell
An inexpensive, 3D‐printable breast muscle meter for field ornithologists
Powell, Luke L.; Metallo, Adam; Jarrett, Crinan; Cooper, Nathan W.; Marra, Peter P.; McWilliams, Scott R.; Bauchinger, Ulf; Dossman, Bryant C.
Authors
Adam Metallo
Crinan Jarrett
Nathan W. Cooper
Peter P. Marra
Scott R. McWilliams
Ulf Bauchinger
Bryant C. Dossman
Abstract
The size of the pectoral muscle is an important component of body condition in birds and has been linked to indices of fitness and migratory performance. Bauchinger et al. (2011. Journal of Ornithology 152: 507–514) developed, calibrated, and validated an aluminum “muscle meter” device that estimates the size of pectoral muscles noninvasively. To make this tool more widely available, we created a CAD model from 3D-scan data of the aluminum muscle meter that can be 3D-printed in durable plastic for ~ $30 USD. We tested this device on seven species of songbirds in Jamaica, The Bahamas, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, and Michigan. We demonstrate that the breast muscle meter measurements are (1) repeatable among users, (2) correlated with a four-category visual breast muscle scoring system, and (3) correlated with scaled mass index (an index of body condition). Muscle scores from our device outperformed the traditional four-category muscle scoring system in predicting scaled mass index. Finally, with our device, we quantified the increasing breast muscle size of American Redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla) from March through May as they prepared for spring migration. Given the precision of the 3D-scanning hardware used to generate our 3D image for printing, we produced a plastic muscle meter that is as precise and useful as the aluminum original, but more cost-effective and widely available.
Citation
Powell, L. L., Metallo, A., Jarrett, C., Cooper, N. W., Marra, P. P., McWilliams, S. R., …Dossman, B. C. (2021). An inexpensive, 3D‐printable breast muscle meter for field ornithologists. Journal of Field Ornithology, 92(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12355
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 11, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 22, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2021 |
Deposit Date | Sep 21, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 21, 2021 |
Journal | Journal of Field Ornithology |
Print ISSN | 0273-8570 |
Electronic ISSN | 1557-9263 |
Publisher | Resilience Alliance |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 92 |
Issue | 1 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12355 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1240023 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(537 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
You might also like
Prealternate molt-migration in Rusty Blackbirds and its implications for stopover biology
(2018)
Journal Article
Not all farms are created equal: Shady African cocoa farms promote a richer bat fauna
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search