Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The First ‘Urnfields’ in the Plains of the Danube and the Po

Cavazzuti, Claudio; Arena, Alberta; Cardarelli, Andrea; Fritzl, Michaela; Gavranović, Mario; Hajdu, Tamás; Kiss, Viktória; Köhler, Kitti; Kulcsár, Gabriella; Melis, Eszter; Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina; Szabó, Géza; Szeverényi, Vajk

The First ‘Urnfields’ in the Plains of the Danube and the Po Thumbnail


Authors

Claudio Cavazzuti

Alberta Arena

Andrea Cardarelli

Michaela Fritzl

Mario Gavranović

Tamás Hajdu

Viktória Kiss

Kitti Köhler

Gabriella Kulcsár

Eszter Melis

Katharina Rebay-Salisbury

Géza Szabó

Vajk Szeverényi



Abstract

Archaeological research is currently redefining how large-scale changes occurred in prehistoric times. In addition to the long-standing theoretical dichotomy between ‘cultural transmission’ and ‘demic diffusion’, many alternative models borrowed from sociology can be used to explain the spread of innovations. The emergence of urnfields in Middle and Late Bronze Age Europe is certainly one of these large-scale phenomena; its wide distribution has been traditionally emphasized by the use of the general term Urnenfelderkultur/zeit (starting around 1300 BC). Thanks to new evidence, we are now able to draw a more comprehensive picture, which shows a variety of regional responses to the introduction of the new funerary custom. The earliest ‘urnfields’ can be identified in central Hungary, among the tell communities of the late Nagyrév/Vatya Culture, around 2000 BC. From the nineteenth century BC onwards, the urnfield model is documented among communities in northeastern Serbia, south of the Iron Gates. During the subsequent collapse of the tell system, around 1500 BC, the urnfield model spread into some of the neighbouring regions. The adoption, however, appears more radical in the southern Po plain, as well as in the Sava/Drava/Lower Tisza plains, while in Lower Austria, Transdanubia and in the northern Po plain it seems more gradual and appears to have been subject to processes of syncretism/hybridization with traditional rites. Other areas seem to reject the novelty, at least until the latest phases of the Bronze Age. We argue that a possible explanation for these varied responses relates to the degree of interconnectedness and homophily among communities in the previous phases.

Citation

Cavazzuti, C., Arena, A., Cardarelli, A., Fritzl, M., Gavranović, M., Hajdu, T., Kiss, V., Köhler, K., Kulcsár, G., Melis, E., Rebay-Salisbury, K., Szabó, G., & Szeverényi, V. (2022). The First ‘Urnfields’ in the Plains of the Danube and the Po. Journal of World Prehistory, 35(1), 45-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-022-09164-0

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 2, 2022
Online Publication Date Mar 18, 2022
Publication Date 2022-03
Deposit Date May 12, 2022
Publicly Available Date May 12, 2022
Journal Journal of World Prehistory
Print ISSN 0892-7537
Electronic ISSN 1573-7802
Publisher Springer
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 35
Issue 1
Pages 45-86
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-022-09164-0
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1208291

Files

Published Journal Article (3.8 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations