Tom McLean
Quaker accountability regimes: The case of the Richardson family networks, 1840 - 1914
McLean, Tom; McGovern, Tom; Slack, Richard; McLean, Malcolm
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to explore the development of the accountability ideals and practices of Quaker industrialists during the period 1840 – 1914. Design/methodology/approach – The research employs a case study approach and draws on the extensive archives of Quaker industrialists in the Richardson family networks, British Parliamentary Papers and the Religious Society of Friends together with relevant contemporary and current literature. Findings – Friends shed their position as Enemies of the State and obtained status and accountabilities undifferentiated from those of non-Quakers. The reciprocal influences of an increasingly complex business environment and radical changes in religious beliefs and practices combined to shift accountabilities from the Quaker Meeting House to newly established legal accountability mechanisms. Static Quaker organization structures and accountability processes were ineffective in a rapidly changing world. Decision-making was susceptible to the domination of the large Richardson family networks in the Newcastle Meeting House. This research found no evidence of Quaker corporate social accountability through action in the Richardson family networks and it questions the validity of this concept. The motivations underlying Quakers’ personal philanthropy and social activism were multiple and complex, extending far beyond accountabilities driven by religious belief. Originality/value –This research has originality and value as a study of continuity and change in Quaker accountability regimes during a period that encompassed fundamental changes in Quakerism and its orthopraxy, and their business, social and political environments.
Citation
McLean, T., McGovern, T., Slack, R., & McLean, M. (2023). Quaker accountability regimes: The case of the Richardson family networks, 1840 - 1914. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 36(3), 859-884. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-06-2018-3516
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 1, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 21, 2022 |
Publication Date | Apr 4, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Sep 1, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 1, 2022 |
Journal | Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal |
Print ISSN | 0951-3574 |
Publisher | Emerald |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 36 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 859-884 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-06-2018-3516 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1193461 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(399 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This author accepted manuscript is deposited under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC) licence. This means that anyone may distribute, adapt, and build upon the work for non-commercial purposes, subject to full attribution. If you wish to use this manuscript for commercial purposes, please contact permissions@emerald.com
You might also like
Understanding Fund Manager readership of annual report risk disclosure
(2023)
Journal Article
Reporting of R&D: Disclosure Without Recognition?
(2023)
Report
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search