Gordon Pennycook
Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophistication
Pennycook, Gordon; Bago, Bence; McPhetres, Jonathon
Abstract
Some theoretical models assume that a primary source of contention surrounding science belief is political and that partisan disagreement drives beliefs; other models focus on basic science knowledge and cognitive sophistication, arguing that they facilitate proscientific beliefs. To test these competing models, we identified a range of controversial issues subject to potential ideological disagreement and examined the roles of political ideology, science knowledge, and cognitive sophistication on science beliefs. Our results indicate that there was surprisingly little partisan disagreement on a wide range of contentious scientific issues. We also found weak evidence for identity-protective cognition (where cognitive sophistication exacerbates partisan disagreement); instead, cognitive sophistication (i.e., reasoning ability) was generally associated with proscience beliefs. In two studies focusing on anthropogenic climate change, we found that increased political motivations did not increase polarization among individuals who are higher in cognitive sophistication, which indicates that increased political motivations might not have as straightforward an impact on science beliefs as has been assumed in the literature. Finally, our findings indicate that basic science knowledge is the most consistent predictor of people’s beliefs about science across a wide range of issues. These results suggest that educators and policymakers should focus on increasing basic science literacy and critical thinking rather than on the ideologies that purportedly divide people.
Citation
Pennycook, G., Bago, B., & McPhetres, J. (2023). Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophistication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001267
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2023-01 |
Deposit Date | Aug 23, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 23, 2022 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: General |
Print ISSN | 0096-3445 |
Electronic ISSN | 1939-2222 |
Publisher | American Psychological Association |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 152 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 80-97 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001267 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1193375 |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(1.3 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©American Psychological Association, 2022. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001267
You might also like
Psychological Distance to Science as a Predictor of Science Skepticism Across Domains
(2022)
Journal Article
A decade of theory as reflected in Psychological Science (2009–2019)
(2021)
Journal Article
Character deprecation in fake news: Is it in supply or demand?
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search