Pandemic response strategies and threshold phenomena

Streicher, Pieter; Broadbent, Alex

Abstract

This paper critically evaluates the Suppression Threshold Strategy (STS) for controlling Covid-19 (C-19). STS asserts a “fundamental distinction” between suppression and mitigation strategies, reflected in very different outcomes in eventual mortality depending on whether reproductive number R is caused to fall below 1. We show that there is no real distinction based on any value of R which falls in any case from early on in an epidemic wave. We show that actual mortality outcomes lay on a continuum, correlating with suppression levels, but not exhibiting any step changes or threshold effects. We argue that an excessive focus on achieving suppression at all costs, driven by the erroneous notion that suppression is a threshold, led to a lack of information on how to trade off the effects of different specific interventions. This led many countries to continue with inappropriate intervention-packages even after it became clear that their initial goal was not going to be attained. Future pandemic planning must support the design of “Plan B", which may be quite different from “Plan A".

Citation

Streicher, P., & Broadbent, A. (2023). Pandemic response strategies and threshold phenomena. Global epidemiology, 5, Article 100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100105

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Apr 6, 2023
• Online Publication Date: Apr 7, 2023
• Publication Date: 2023
• Deposit Date: May 4, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Oct 25, 2023
• Journal: Global Epidemiology
• Electronic ISSN: 2590-1133
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 5
• Article Number: 100105
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100105
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1175248