G.M. Finn
Students' perceptions of body painting as a tool for learning anatomy
Finn, G.M.; McLachlan, J.C.
Authors
J.C. McLachlan
Abstract
Background: Alternative approaches to anatomy teaching are becoming popular in response to a reduction in timetabled anatomy teaching and a decline in the number of body donors. This study ascertained students’ perceptions of body painting (BP) as a tool for learning anatomy. Summary of work: 133 medical students participated in 24 focus groups (2007-09). Data analysis utilised a grounded theory approach. Summary of results: 5 themes emerged: 1) BP as a fun learning activity, 2) BP promoting retention of knowledge, 3) factors contributing to the memorability of body painting, 4) removal from comfort zone, 5) the impact of body painting on students' future clinical practice. Conclusions: Students perceive BP to be a fun learning activity, which aids their retention of the anatomical knowledge acquired during the session. Sensory factors, such as visual stimuli, especially colour, and the tactile nature of the activity, promote recall. Students' preference for painting or being painted is often dependent upon their learning style. Take-home messages: BP is a useful adjunct to traditional anatomy and clinical skills teaching. The fun element involved in the delivery of this teaching defuses the formal academic context, promoting a positive learning environment. The undressing involved encouraged students to consider issues surrounding body image; this informs their attitudes towards future patients.
Citation
Finn, G., & McLachlan, J. (2010, September). Students' perceptions of body painting as a tool for learning anatomy. Presented at Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) Conference 2010, Glasgow, UK
Presentation Conference Type | Conference Paper (published) |
---|---|
Conference Name | Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) Conference 2010 |
Start Date | Sep 4, 2010 |
End Date | Sep 8, 2010 |
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2010 |
Deposit Date | Feb 1, 2011 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1158410 |
Publisher URL | http://www.amee.org/index.asp?pg=132 |
Additional Information | Conference dates: 4-8 Sep 2010 |
You might also like
Twelve tips for implementing a successful peer assessment
(2011)
Journal Article
"You're judged all the time!" Students' views on professionalism: A multi-centre study
(2010)
Journal Article
Virtual Human Dissector as a Learning Tool for Studying Cross-sectional Anatomy
(2009)
Journal Article
Timely and Tiny: Supporting remote learning through the use of Personal Digital Assistants
(2011)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search