Alison Wylie
Feminist Philosophy of Science: Standpoint Matters
Wylie, Alison
Authors
Abstract
Feminist standpoint theory has a contentious history. It is an explicitly political as well as social epistemologa characterized by the thesis that those who are marginalized or oppressed under conditions of systemic inequity may, in fact, be better knowers, in a number of respects, than those who are socially or economically privileged. Their epistemic advantage arises from the kinds of experience they are likely to have, situated as they are, and the resources available to them for understanding this experience. Feminist standpoint theorists argue that gender is one dimension of social differentiation that makes such an epistemic difference.1 Standard critiques of feminist standpoint theory attribute to it two manifestly untenable theses: that epistemically consequential standpoints must be conceptualized in essentialist terms, and that those who occupy them have automatic and comprehensive epistemic privilege. A world structured by hierarchical, oppressive social divisions thus becomes a world of unbridgeable epistemic solitudes. I agree that neither thesis is tenable and I argue that neither is a necessary presupposition of standpoint theory. The anxious philosophical nightmare of corrosive relativism2 does not afflict standpoint theorists any more than it does other varieties of social epistemology and socially naturalized contextualism, and need not be epistemically disabling in any case. My aim here is to offer a systematic reformulation of standpoint theory, and address two questions: What epistemic insights does standpoint theory offer? And what is the scope of its application?
Citation
Wylie, A. (2012, November). Feminist Philosophy of Science: Standpoint Matters. Presented at Eighty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division of the American Philosophical Association, Seattle
Presentation Conference Type | Conference Paper (published) |
---|---|
Conference Name | Eighty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division of the American Philosophical Association |
Online Publication Date | Nov 1, 2012 |
Publication Date | Nov 1, 2012 |
Deposit Date | Sep 23, 2013 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 23, 2017 |
Volume | 86 |
Pages | 47-76 |
Series Number | 2 |
Series ISSN | 0065-972X |
Book Title | Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1155509 |
Publisher URL | http://www.jstor.org/stable/43661298 |
Files
Published Conference Proceeding
(366 Kb)
PDF
Accepted Conference Proceeding
(336 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology
(2016)
Book
How Archaeological Evidence Bites Back Strategies for Putting Old Data to Work in New Ways
(2016)
Journal Article
Archaeological Finds: Legacies of Appropriation, Modes of Response
(2009)
Book Chapter
What Knowers Know Well: Women, Work and the Academy
(2011)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search