Outputs (1057)

Origins of Rights and Freedoms (2013)
Book Chapter
Fenwick, H. (2013). Origins of Rights and Freedoms. In L. M. O. Clashfern, & D. Falkowski (Eds.), Halsbury's Laws. (5th ed.). LexisNexis Butterworths

Teaching Controversial Issues: A Law-in-Action Workshop on Stem Cell Research for Post-16 Students (2017)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Pattinson, S. D., Douglas, B., & Kind, V. (2017, December). Teaching Controversial Issues: A Law-in-Action Workshop on Stem Cell Research for Post-16 Students. Paper presented at [2 x 1 hour papers] ASE Annual Conference, University of Reading

Northern Ireland (2010)
Book Chapter
O'Mahony, D. (2010). Northern Ireland. In F. Dunkel, J. Grzywa, P. Horsfield, I. Pruin, I. C. with, A. Gensing, …D. O’Mahony (Eds.), Juvenile justice systems in Europe : current situation and reform developments (957-990). Forum Verlag Godesberg

When the bough breaks – Defences and sentencing options available in battered-women and similar scenarios under German Criminal Law (2011)
Book Chapter
Bohlander, M. (2011). When the bough breaks – Defences and sentencing options available in battered-women and similar scenarios under German Criminal Law. In A. Reed, & M. Bohlander (Eds.), Loss of control and diminished responsibility : domestic, comparative and international perspectives (247-270). Ashgate Publishing

Using a Moot to Develop Students' Understanding of Human Cloning and Statutory Interpretation (2016)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Pattinson, S. D. (2016, December). Using a Moot to Develop Students' Understanding of Human Cloning and Statutory Interpretation. Paper presented at SLS Annual Conference 2016, University of Oxford

Complex Technology, Complex Calculations: Uses and Abuses of Precautionary Reasoning in Law. (2009)
Book Chapter
Beyleveld, D., & Brownsword, R. (2009). Complex Technology, Complex Calculations: Uses and Abuses of Precautionary Reasoning in Law. In P. Sollie, M. Duewell, & et al. (Eds.), Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technological Developments (175-190). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5_12

The Bill of Rights Commission Report: disappointing Conservative expectations or fulfilling them? (2013)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Fenwick, H. (2013, December). The Bill of Rights Commission Report: disappointing Conservative expectations or fulfilling them?. Paper presented at Bill of Rights Commission Report: Where are we now?, Durham, England

Ireland: The Separation of Powers Doctrine vs Human Rights (2009)
Book Chapter
Nolan, A. (2009). Ireland: The Separation of Powers Doctrine vs Human Rights. In M. Langford (Ed.), Social rights jurisprudence : emerging trends in international and comparative law (295-322). Cambridge University Press

Legal Regulation of Assisted Procreation, Genetic Diangosis and Gene Therapy (1999)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Pattinson, S. D. (1999, December). Legal Regulation of Assisted Procreation, Genetic Diangosis and Gene Therapy. Paper presented at Third Conference of the European Network of Biomedical Ethics, University of Sheffield

The Donor as Vendor (2003)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Pattinson, S. D. (2003, December). The Donor as Vendor. Paper presented at Lent Lecture Series, Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College, University of London

Sécurité des produits et information du donsommateur (2009)
Book Chapter
Garde, A. (2009). Sécurité des produits et information du donsommateur. In C. Flaesch-Mougin (Ed.), Union Européenne et Sécurité : aspects internes et externes (185-218). Bruylant

Paying Living Organ Providers (2003)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Pattinson, S. D. (2003, December). Paying Living Organ Providers. Paper presented at Invited paper, University of Helsinki, Finland

Response to Dignity as Constraint (2004)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Pattinson, S. D. (2004, December). Response to Dignity as Constraint. Paper presented at Invited paper, Montreal, Canada

Donor Autonomy and the Allocation of Donated Organs for Transplantation (2011)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Pattinson, S. D. (2011, December). Donor Autonomy and the Allocation of Donated Organs for Transplantation. Paper presented at Issues in Biosciences: Regulation and Social Impact, Durham University

Response to the Stem Cell Conundrum and Mapping Global Distributions of hES Cell Lines (2009)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Pattinson, S. D. (2009, December). Response to the Stem Cell Conundrum and Mapping Global Distributions of hES Cell Lines. Paper presented at Lay of the Land, Montreal, Canada

Research Ethics in Biomedicine: Commercialisation and Commodification (2011)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Pattinson, S. D. (2011, December). Research Ethics in Biomedicine: Commercialisation and Commodification. Paper presented at Research ethics in the life sciences, University of Tübingen, Germany

The Ethics of Stem Cell Research (2014)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Pattinson, S. D. (2014, December). The Ethics of Stem Cell Research. Paper presented at Matariki Workshop on Research Ethics, University of Tübingen, Germany

Setting the limits of political self-determination in democracies in relation to international human rights (2013)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Fenwick, H. (2013, December). Setting the limits of political self-determination in democracies in relation to international human rights. Paper presented at Centre for International Law and HUman Rights, University of Lancaster

State Surveillance: in the Human Rights Act era. (2001)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Fenwick, H. (2001, October). State Surveillance: in the Human Rights Act era. Paper presented at Human Rights Unit launch at University of Leeds., Leeds, England

Indefinite Detention without Trial - the “response” of Great Britain's legal order to September 11 2001: conflicts with fundamental rights. (2004)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Fenwick, H. (2004, December). Indefinite Detention without Trial - the “response” of Great Britain's legal order to September 11 2001: conflicts with fundamental rights. Paper presented at The European Anti-Terrorist Legislation and the protection of fundamental rights and liberties., Brussels, Brussels