All Outputs (4)

Reaching across social divides deliberately: Theoretical, political, and practical implications of intergroup contact volition for intergroup relations (2024)
Journal Article
Paolini, S., Harwood, J., Rubin, M., Huck, J., Dunn, K., & Dixon, J. (2024). Reaching across social divides deliberately: Theoretical, political, and practical implications of intergroup contact volition for intergroup relations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 18(8), Article e12988. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12988

The benefits of positive intergroup contact for intergroup attitudes are well‐established. Yet individual and group self‐segregation practices demonstrate that opportunities for intergroup contact are not sufficient for contact uptake; and persistent... Read More about Reaching across social divides deliberately: Theoretical, political, and practical implications of intergroup contact volition for intergroup relations.

Intersectional invisibility: The moderating impact of perceived incongruence between stigmatized identities (2024)
Journal Article
Sternberg, B., Badea, C., Sesko, A. K., & Rubin, M. (online). Intersectional invisibility: The moderating impact of perceived incongruence between stigmatized identities. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241245393

There is evidence that people with multiple stigmatized identities sometimes experience psychological invisibility—perceivers show difficulty remembering information about these targets (e.g., their faces, spoken statements). In three experiments (to... Read More about Intersectional invisibility: The moderating impact of perceived incongruence between stigmatized identities.

Inconsistent multiple testing corrections: The fallacy of using family-based error rates to make inferences about individual hypotheses (2024)
Journal Article
Rubin, M. (2024). Inconsistent multiple testing corrections: The fallacy of using family-based error rates to make inferences about individual hypotheses. Methods in Psychology, 10, Article 100140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2024.100140

Type I Error Rates Are Not Usually Inflated (2024)
Preprint / Working Paper
Rubin, M. (2023). Type I Error Rates Are Not Usually Inflated

The inflation of Type I error rates is thought to be one of the causes of the replication crisis. Questionable research practices such as p-hacking are thought to inflate Type I error rates above their nominal level, leading to unexpectedly high leve... Read More about Type I Error Rates Are Not Usually Inflated.