R Kirkham
What Do Judges Actually Do in Judicial Review? An Argument for Systematic Studies
Kirkham, R; O'Loughlin, EA
Citation
Kirkham, R., & O'Loughlin, E. (in press). What Do Judges Actually Do in Judicial Review? An Argument for Systematic Studies. [Blog]
Digital Artefact Type | Other |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 2, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 2, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Feb 28, 2020 |
Publisher URL | https://adminlawblog.org/2018/11/02/richard-kirkham-and-elizabeth-a-oloughlin-what-do-judges-actually-do-in-judicial-review-an-argument-for-systematic-studies/ |
You might also like
Recent Judicial Perspectives on the Duty of Candour
(2023)
Journal Article
Government’s Duty of Candour: On the Move?
(2023)
Journal Article
The Duty of Candour: Inside the Black Box
(2022)
Presentation / Conference
Reforms to section 3 of the Human Rights Act
(2022)
Presentation / Conference
The Duty of Candour in Judicial Review: The Case of the Lost Policy
(2022)
Digital Artefact
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search