Reply to Redding, Rosen and Wood

Brooks, Thom

Abstract

Hegel's Philosophy of Right is more than a major work of politicla and legal philosophy; it is a battleground for two different interpretive approaches. My Hegel's Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right argues that these approaches are mistaken about their differences and that one approach offers a more compelling interpretation of Hegel's Philosophy of Right than the other. I will briefly outline my defence of the systematic reading of the Philosophy of Right before replying to the constructive criticism raised by Paul Redding, Michael Rosen and Allen Wood.

Citation

Brooks, T. (2012). Reply to Redding, Rosen and Wood. Hegel Bulletin, 66, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0263523200000483

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Publication Date: 2012
• Deposit Date: Nov 21, 2012
• Journal: Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain.
• Print ISSN: 2051-5367
• Electronic ISSN: 2051-5375
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 66
• Pages: 23-35
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0263523200000483
• Keywords: Hegel, Philosophy of Right