S. Williams
What people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers
Williams, S.; Terras, M.; Warwick, C.
Abstract
Purpose – Since its introduction in 2006, messages posted to the microblogging system Twitter have provided a rich dataset for researchers, leading to the publication of over a thousand academic papers. This paper aims to identify this published work and to classify it in order to understand Twitter based research. Design/methodology/approach – Firstly the papers on Twitter were identified. Secondly, following a review of the literature, a classification of the dimensions of microblogging research was established. Thirdly, papers were qualitatively classified using open coded content analysis, based on the paper's title and abstract, in order to analyze method, subject, and approach. Findings – The majority of published work relating to Twitter concentrates on aspects of the messages sent and details of the users. A variety of methodological approaches is used across a range of identified domains. Research limitations/implications – This work reviewed the abstracts of all papers available via database search on the term “Twitter” and this has two major implications: the full papers are not considered and so works may be misclassified if their abstract is not clear; publications not indexed by the databases, such as book chapters, are not included. The study is focussed on microblogging, the applicability of the approach to other media is not considered. Originality/value – To date there has not been an overarching study to look at the methods and purpose of those using Twitter as a research subject. The paper's major contribution is to scope out papers published on Twitter until the close of 2011. The classification derived here will provide a framework within which researchers studying Twitter related topics will be able to position and ground their work.
Citation
Williams, S., Terras, M., & Warwick, C. (2013). What people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers. Journal of Documentation, 69(3), 384-410. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-03-2012-0027
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Apr 1, 2013 |
Deposit Date | Sep 5, 2014 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 7, 2014 |
Journal | Journal of Documentation |
Print ISSN | 0022-0418 |
Publisher | Emerald |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 69 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 384-410 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-03-2012-0027 |
Keywords | Twitter, Microblogging, Abstracts, Papers, Classification, Social network systems, Social networking sites, Blogs. |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1454626 |
Related Public URLs | http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1391572/ |
Files
Accepted Journal Article
(905 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This article is © Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here http://dro.dur.ac.uk/13565/. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
You might also like
Designing for Audience Engagement Exploring the Use of Online Metrics in the GLAM Sector
(2023)
Journal Article
Understanding levels of online participation in the U.K. museum sector
(2023)
Journal Article
Embedding creativity into digital resources: Improving information discovery for art history
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search