Chicken tumours and fishy revenge: Evidence for emotional content bias in the cumulative recall of urban legends

Stubbersfield, J.; Tehrani, J.; Flynn, E.

Abstract

This study used urban legends to examine the effects of a cognitive bias for content which evokes higher levels of emotion on cumulative recall. As with previous research into content biases, a linear transmission chain design was used. One-hundred and twenty participants, aged 16–52, were asked to read and then recall urban legends that provoked both high levels and low levels of emotion and were both positively and negatively valenced. The product of this recall was presented to the next participant in a chain of three generations. A significant effect of emotion level on transmission fidelity was found with high emotion legends being recalled with significantly greater accuracy than low emotion legends. The emotional valence of a legend was found not to have any effect on cumulative recall; thus emotional biases in recall go beyond disgust and can incorporate other emotions such as amusement, interest and surprise. This study is the first to examine an emotion bias in cultural transmission as a general phenomenon without focusing on the emotion of disgust.

Citation

Stubbersfield, J., Tehrani, J., & Flynn, E. (2017). Chicken tumours and fishy revenge: Evidence for emotional content bias in the cumulative recall of urban legends. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 17(1-2), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342189

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Oct 13, 2015
• Online Publication Date: Feb 8, 2017
• Publication Date: Feb 8, 2017
• Deposit Date: Oct 15, 2015
• Publicly Available Date: Feb 8, 2019
• Journal: Journal of Cognition and Culture
• Print ISSN: 1567-7095
• Electronic ISSN: 1568-5373
• Publisher: Brill Academic Publishers
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 1-2
• Pages: 12-26
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342189
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1400366