R.J. Asher
Phylogenetic Signal and Bias in Paleontology
Asher, R.J.; Smith, M.R
Abstract
An unprecedented amount of evidence now illuminates the phylogeny of living mammals and birds on the Tree of Life. We use this tree to measure phylogenetic value of data typically used in paleontology (bones and teeth) from six datasets derived from five published studies. We ask three interrelated questions: 1) Can these data adequately reconstruct known parts of the Tree of Life? 2) Is accuracy generally similar for studies using morphology, or do some morphological datasets perform better than others? 3) Does the loss of non-fossilizable data cause taxa to occur in misleadingly basal positions? Adding morphology to DNA datasets usually increases congruence of resulting topologies to the well corroborated tree, but this varies among morphological datasets. Extant taxa with a high proportion of missing morphological characters can greatly reduce phylogenetic resolution when analyzed together with fossils. Attempts to ameliorate this by deleting extant taxa missing morphology are prone to decreased accuracy due to long-branch artefacts. We find no evidence that fossilization causes extinct taxa to incorrectly appear at or near topologically basal branches. Morphology comprises the evidence held in common by living taxa and fossils, and phylogenetic analysis of fossils greatly benefits from inclusion of molecular and morphological data sampled for living taxa, whatever methods are used for phylogeny estimation.
Citation
Asher, R., & Smith, M. (2022). Phylogenetic Signal and Bias in Paleontology. Systematic Biology, 71(4), 986-1008. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syab072
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 27, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 1, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2022-07 |
Deposit Date | Aug 31, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 25, 2021 |
Journal | Systematic Biology |
Print ISSN | 1063-5157 |
Electronic ISSN | 1076-836X |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 71 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 986-1008 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syab072 |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1242784 |
Files
Published Journal Article
(3.8 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contactjournals.permissions@oup.com
You might also like
Evolution: Assembling the Deuterostome body plan
(2023)
Journal Article
Protomelission is an early dasyclad alga and not a Cambrian bryozoan
(2023)
Journal Article
The Cambrian cirratuliform Iotuba denotes an early annelid radiation
(2023)
Journal Article
Using information theory to detect rogue taxa and improve consensus trees
(2021)
Journal Article
Robust analysis of phylogenetic tree space
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search