Rob Poole
Psychiatrists’ attitudes to professional boundaries concerning spirituality and religion: mixed-methods study
Poole, Rob; Cook, Christopher C. H.; Song, Robert; Robinson, Catherine A.
Authors
Christopher Cook c.c.h.cook@durham.ac.uk
Emeritus Professor
Professor Robert Song robert.song@durham.ac.uk
Professor
Catherine A. Robinson
Abstract
Aims and method
Calls for the integration of spirituality into psychiatric practice have raised concerns about boundary violations. We sought to develop a method to capture psychiatrists’ attitudes to professional boundaries and spirituality, explore consensus and understand what factors are considered. Case vignettes were developed, tested and refined. Three vignettes were presented to 80 mental health professionals (53% said they were psychiatrists; 39% did not identify their professional status). Participants recorded their reactions to the vignettes. Four researchers categorised these as identifying boundary violations or not and analysed the factors considered.
Results
In 90% of cases, at least three of the four researchers agreed on classification (boundary violation; possible boundary violation; no boundary violation). Participants’ opinion about boundary violations was heterogeneous. There was consensus that psychiatrists should not proselytise in clinical settings. Reasoning emphasised pragmatic concerns. Few participants mentioned their religious beliefs. Equivocation was common.
Clinical implications
Mental health professionals seem unsure about professional boundaries concerning religion and spirituality in psychiatric practice.
Citation
Poole, R., Cook, C. C. H., Song, R., & Robinson, C. A. (2023). Psychiatrists’ attitudes to professional boundaries concerning spirituality and religion: mixed-methods study. BJPsych Bulletin, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2023.66
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 8, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 17, 2023 |
Publication Date | Aug 17, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Feb 21, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 21, 2024 |
Journal | BJPsych Bulletin |
Print ISSN | 2056-4694 |
Electronic ISSN | 2056-4708 |
Publisher | Royal College of Psychiatrists |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Pages | 1-5 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2023.66 |
Keywords | Psychiatry and Mental health |
Public URL | https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2271208 |
Files
Published Journal Article (Advanced Online Version)
(480 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
You might also like
Desiring machines: The sexbot paradox
(2020)
Book Chapter
Play It Again, but This Time with Ontological Conviction: A Response to Jonathan Marks
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search