Why Do We Do What We Do? Comparing Legal Methods in Five Law Schools through Survey Evidence
Siems, Mathias; Mac Sithigh, Daithi
Daithi Mac Sithigh
Rob van Gestel
Edward L. Rubin
For the purpose of this paper we conducted an empirical survey of academic staff at two German law schools (Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf; Bucerius Law School), two UK ones (University of East Anglia; University of Edinburgh) and one Irish one (Trinity College, Dublin). We asked the legal scholars to indicate to what extent they identify with legal research as part of humanities, as part of social sciences, and as akin to the analysis of law in legal practice. In this paper we present and discuss our results, using tools of both classical and compositional statistics. We also relate our data to contextual information about these legal scholars (e.g., training, career stage) as well as institutional and country differences. Our main general finding is that scholars of the German law schools have a relatively strong preference for practical legal research and scholars of the UK and Irish law schools a relatively strong preference for law as humanities. Some of our specific findings are that international legal scholars tend to be closer to the social sciences and that younger scholars and private lawyers tend to be closer to practical legal research. We also observe some signs of convergence since, across the five law schools, scholars told us that they tend to use practical legal research methods less often, and social sciences methods more often, than ten years ago.
Siems, M., & Mac Sithigh, D. (2017). Why Do We Do What We Do? Comparing Legal Methods in Five Law Schools through Survey Evidence. In R. van Gestel, H. Micklitz, & E. L. Rubin (Eds.), Rethinking legal scholarship: a transatlantic interchange (31-83). Cambridge University Press
|Online Publication Date||Feb 1, 2017|
|Publication Date||Feb 1, 2017|
|Deposit Date||Feb 2, 2017|
|Publicly Available Date||Aug 1, 2017|
|Publisher||Cambridge University Press|
|Book Title||Rethinking legal scholarship: a transatlantic interchange.|
|Related Public URLs||https://ssrn.com/abstract=2625473|
Accepted Book Chapter
This material has been published in Rethinking legal scholarship: a transatlantic interchange edited by Rob van Gestel, Hans Micklitz and Edward L. Rubin. This version is free to view and download for personal use only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Rob van Gestel, Hans-W. Micklitz and Edward L. Rubin 2017
You might also like
Foreign-trained legal scholars in the UK: ‘irritants’ or ‘change agents’?
The Power of Comparative Law: What Types of Units Can Comparative Law Compare?
The law and ethics of ‘cultural appropriation’
The Illusion of Motion: Corporate (Im)Mobility and the Failed Promise of Centros