Placentation and maternal investment in mammals
Capellini, Isabella; Venditti, Chris; Barton, R.A.
Professor Robert Barton firstname.lastname@example.org
The mammalian placenta exhibits striking inter-specific morphological variation, yet the implications of such diversity for reproductive strategies and fetal development remain obscure. More invasive hemochorial placentae, in which fetal tissues directly contact the maternal blood supply, are believed to facilitate nutrient transfer, resulting in higher fetal growth rates, and to be a state of relative fetal advantage in the evolution of maternal-offspring conflict. The extent of interdigitation between maternal and fetal tissues has received less attention than invasiveness but is also potentially important because it influences the surface area for exchange. We show that, although increased placental invasiveness and interdigitation are both associated with shorter gestations, interdigitation is the key variable. Gestation times associated with highly interdigitated labyrinthine placentae are 44% of those associated with less interdigitated villous and trabecular placentae. There is however no relationship between placental traits and neonatal body and brain size. Hence, species with more interdigitated placentae produce neonates of similar body and brain size but in less than half the time. We suggest that the effects of placental interdigitation on growth rates and the way that these are traded off against gestation length may be promising avenues for understanding the evolutionary dynamics of conflict.
Capellini, I., Venditti, C., & Barton, R. (2011). Placentation and maternal investment in mammals. The American Naturalist, 177(1), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1086/657435
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Jan 1, 2011|
|Deposit Date||Oct 4, 2010|
|Publicly Available Date||Feb 19, 2014|
|Publisher||The University of Chicago Press|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Placenta, Maternal investment, Parent-offspring conflict, Phylogenetic, Foetal growth.|
Published Journal Article
© 2010 by The University of Chicago.
You might also like
A systematic review of sex differences in rough and tumble play across non-human mammals
Understanding the human brain: insights from comparative biology
Experts in action: why we need an embodied social brain hypothesis
Maternal investment, life histories, and the evolution of brain structure in primates