In legal academia it is highly controversial how to ‘be original’ in legal research. This article will try to maintain an attitude of tolerance in not promoting or discrediting one particular methodology. Instead, it will identify four different ways of ‘being original’. Perhaps the most common approach is to deal with ‘micro-legal questions’. Many legal academics also pursue research in ‘macro-legal questions’. Less common but growing is the importance of ‘scientific legal research’ and research in ‘non-legal topics’.
Siems, M. (2008). Legal Originality. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28(1), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqm024
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Publication Date||Apr 1, 2008|
|Deposit Date||Jul 8, 2011|
|Publicly Available Date||Aug 23, 2011|
|Journal||Oxford Journal of Legal Studies|
|Publisher||Oxford University Press|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
Accepted Journal Article
This is a pre-copy-editing author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Oxford journal of legal studies following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Siems, Mathias (2008) 'Legal originality.', Oxford journal of legal studies., 28 (1). pp. 147-164 is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqm024
You might also like
Foreign-trained legal scholars in the UK: ‘irritants’ or ‘change agents’?
The Power of Comparative Law: What Types of Units Can Comparative Law Compare?
The law and ethics of ‘cultural appropriation’
The Illusion of Motion: Corporate (Im)Mobility and the Failed Promise of Centros