Professor Nancy Cartwright nancy.cartwright@durham.ac.uk
Professor
In this paper the claim that laws of nature are to be understood as claims about what necessarily or reliably happens is disputed. Laws can characterize what happens in a reliable way, but they do not do this easily. We do not have laws for everything occurring in the world, but only for those situations where what happens in nature is represented by a model: models are blueprints for nomological machines, which in turn give rise to laws. An example from economics shows, in particular, how we use--and how we need to use--models to get probabilistic laws.
Cartwright, N. (1997). Models: The Blueprints for Laws. Philosophy of Science, 64, S292-S303. https://doi.org/10.1086/392608
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Dec 1, 1997 |
Deposit Date | Sep 24, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 27, 2016 |
Journal | Philosophy of Science |
Print ISSN | 0031-8248 |
Publisher | Philosophy of Science Association |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 64 |
Pages | S292-S303 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1086/392608 |
Published Journal Article
(268 Kb)
PDF
Objectivity and Intellectual Humility in Scientific Research: They’re Harder Than You Think
(2023)
Journal Article
A Philosopher Looks at Science
(2022)
Book
Rigour versus the need for evidential diversity
(2021)
Journal Article
X—Why Trust Science? Reliability, Particularity and the Tangle of Science
(2020)
Conference Proceeding
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Advanced Search