Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A Dangerous Method? The German Discourse on Hypnotic Suggestion Therapy around 1900

Maehle, Andreas-Holger

A Dangerous Method? The German Discourse on Hypnotic Suggestion Therapy around 1900 Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

In the late nineteenth century, German-speaking physicians and psychiatrists intensely debated the benefits and risks of treatment by hypnotic suggestion. While practitioners of the method sought to provide convincing evidence for its therapeutic efficacy in many medical conditions, especially nervous disorders, critics pointed to dangerous side effects, including the triggering of hysterical attacks or deterioration of nervous symptoms. Other critics claimed that patients merely simulated hypnotic phenomena in order to appease their therapist. A widespread concern was the potential for abuses of hypnosis, either by giving criminal suggestions or in the form of sexual assaults on hypnotized patients. Official inquiries by the Prussian Minister for Religious, Educational and Medical Affairs in 1902 and 1906 indicated that relatively few doctors practised hypnotherapy, whereas the method was increasingly used by lay healers. Although the Ministry found no evidence for serious harm caused by hypnotic treatments, whether performed by doctors or by lay healers, many German doctors seem to have regarded hypnotic suggestion therapy as a problematic method and abstained from using it.

Citation

Maehle, A. (2017). A Dangerous Method? The German Discourse on Hypnotic Suggestion Therapy around 1900. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, 71(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2017.0006

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 23, 2017
Online Publication Date Mar 29, 2017
Publication Date Jun 20, 2017
Deposit Date Jan 23, 2017
Publicly Available Date Mar 29, 2018
Journal Notes and Records of the Royal Society
Print ISSN 0035-9149
Electronic ISSN 1743-0178
Publisher The Royal Society
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 71
Issue 2
Pages 197-211
DOI https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2017.0006

Files







You might also like



Downloadable Citations