Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The accuracy and reliability of traditional surface flow type mapping: is it time for a new method of characterizing physical river habitat?

Woodget, A.S.; Visser, F.; Maddock, I.P.; Carbonneau, P.E.

The accuracy and reliability of traditional surface flow type mapping: is it time for a new method of characterizing physical river habitat? Thumbnail


Authors

A.S. Woodget

F. Visser

I.P. Maddock



Abstract

Surface flow types (SFTs) are advocated as ecologically relevant hydraulic units, often mapped visually from the bankside to characterize rapidly the physical habitat of rivers. SFT mapping is simple, non-invasive and cost-efficient. However, it is also qualitative, subjective and plagued by difficulties in recording accurately the spatial extent of SFT units. Quantitative validation of the underlying physical habitat parameters is often lacking and does not consistently differentiate between SFTs. Here, we investigate explicitly the accuracy, reliability and statistical separability of traditionally mapped SFTs as indicators of physical habitat, using independent, hydraulic and topographic data collected during three surveys of a c. 50 m reach of the River Arrow, Warwickshire, England. We also explore the potential of a novel remote sensing approach, comprising a small unmanned aerial system (sUAS) and structure-from-motion photogrammetry (SfM), as an alternative method of physical habitat characterization. Our key findings indicate that SFT mapping accuracy is highly variable, with overall mapping accuracy not exceeding 74%. Results from analysis of similarity tests found that strong differences did not exist between all SFT pairs. This leads us to question the suitability of SFTs for characterizing physical habitat for river science and management applications. In contrast, the sUAS–SfM approach provided high resolution, spatially continuous, spatially explicit, quantitative measurements of water depth and point cloud roughness at the microscale (spatial scales ≤1 m). Such data are acquired rapidly, inexpensively and provide new opportunities for examining the heterogeneity of physical habitat over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Whilst continued refinement of the sUAS–SfM approach is required, we propose that this method offers an opportunity to move away from broad, mesoscale classifications of physical habitat (spatial scales 10–100 m) and towards continuous, quantitative measurements of the continuum of hydraulic and geomorphic conditions, which actually exists at the microscale.

Citation

Woodget, A., Visser, F., Maddock, I., & Carbonneau, P. (2016). The accuracy and reliability of traditional surface flow type mapping: is it time for a new method of characterizing physical river habitat?. River Research and Applications, 32(9), 1902-1914. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3047

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 10, 2016
Online Publication Date Jun 28, 2016
Publication Date Nov 1, 2016
Deposit Date Feb 16, 2017
Publicly Available Date Jun 28, 2017
Journal River Research and Applications
Print ISSN 1535-1459
Electronic ISSN 1535-1467
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 32
Issue 9
Pages 1902-1914
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3047

Files

Accepted Journal Article (1.6 Mb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This is the accepted version of the following article: Woodget, A. S., Visser, F., Maddock, I. P., and Carbonneau, P. E. (2016) The Accuracy and Reliability of Traditional Surface Flow Type Mapping: Is it Time for a New Method of Characterizing Physical River Habitat?. River Research and Applications, 32(9): 1902-1914, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3047. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.







You might also like



Downloadable Citations