Uncertainty analysis of depth predictions from seismic reflection data using Bayesian statistics

Michelioudakis, D.G.; Hobbs, R.W.; Caiado, C.C.S.

Abstract

Estimating the depths of target horizons from seismic reflection data is an important task in exploration geophysics. To constrain these depths we need a reliable and accurate velocity model. Here, we build an optimum 2D seismic reflection data processing flow focused on pre – stack deghosting filters and velocity model building and apply Bayesian methods, including Gaussian process emulation and Bayesian History Matching (BHM), to estimate the uncertainties of the depths of key horizons near the borehole DSDP-258 located in the Mentelle Basin, south west of Australia, and compare the results with the drilled core from that well. Following this strategy, the tie between the modelled and observed depths from DSDP-258 core was in accordance with the ± 2σ posterior credibility intervals and predictions for depths to key horizons were made for the two new drill sites, adjacent the existing borehole of the area. The probabilistic analysis allowed us to generate multiple realizations of pre–stack depth migrated images, these can be directly used to better constrain interpretation and identify potential risk at drill sites. The method will be applied to constrain the drilling targets for the upcoming International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP), leg 369.

Citation

Michelioudakis, D., Hobbs, R., & Caiado, C. (2018). Uncertainty analysis of depth predictions from seismic reflection data using Bayesian statistics. Geophysical Journal International, 213(3), 2161-2176. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy093

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Mar 8, 2018
• Online Publication Date: Mar 9, 2018
• Publication Date: Jun 1, 2018
• Deposit Date: Mar 8, 2018
• Publicly Available Date: Mar 9, 2018
• Journal: Geophysical Journal International
• Print ISSN: 0956-540X
• Electronic ISSN: 1365-246X
• Publisher: Oxford University Press
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 213
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 2161-2176
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy093