Contesting the ‘Active’ in active citizenship: youth activism in Cape Town, South Africa

Buire, Chloé; Staeheli, Lynn A.

Abstract

In post-apartheid South Africa, efforts to encourage practices of citizenship and new citizens who will act in ways that support communities and the nation are promoted by government policies and networks of international organizations, civil society groups, and NGOs. In this paper, we analyse the pedagogy of citizenship that is common in these efforts and the role of ‘active citizenship’ within it. Relying on interviews with leaders of NGOs and activist groups and on participatory research with six organizations, we examine the ways in which different meanings and aspects of active citizenship are mobilized. Active citizenship is often dismissed depoliticizing citizenship and dampening dissent. The activists we interviewed and with whom we worked, however, challenge that critique. A central issue in our analysis are competing views as to whether active citizenship should be evaluated in terms of ‘effectiveness’ or ‘disruption.’ While some agents might incline toward effective and incremental change, many youth activists understand active citizenship as a tool that enables radical, disruptive acts capable of decolonizing South African society. Their use of active citizenship points to the need to avoid conflating citizenship with particular political goals and to not assume that active citizenship is necessarily and unequivocally enrolled in post-political consensus.

Citation

Buire, C., & Staeheli, L. A. (2017). Contesting the ‘Active’ in active citizenship: youth activism in Cape Town, South Africa. Space and Polity, 21(2), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2017.1339374

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jun 2, 2017
• Online Publication Date: Jun 16, 2017
• Publication Date: Jun 16, 2017
• Deposit Date: Jul 18, 2017
• Publicly Available Date: Jun 16, 2018
• Journal: Space and Polity
• Print ISSN: 1356-2576
• Electronic ISSN: 1470-1235
• Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 21
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 173-190
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2017.1339374
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1354545