Lanthanide-induced relaxation anisotropy

Suturina, Elizaveta A.; Mason, Kevin; Geraldes, Carlos F.G.C.; Chilton, Nicholas F.; Parker, David; Kuprov, Ilya

Abstract

Lanthanide ions accelerate nuclear spin relaxation by two primary mechanisms: dipolar and Curie. Both are commonly assumed to depend on the length of the lanthanide-nucleus vector, but not on its direction. Here we show experimentally that this is wrong – careful proton relaxation data analysis in a series of isostructural lanthanide complexes (Ln = Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb) reveals angular dependence in both Curie and dipolar relaxation. The reasons are: (a) that magnetic susceptibility anisotropy can be of the same order of magnitude as the isotropic part (contradicting the unstated assumption in Guéron‘s theory of the Curie relaxation process), and (b) that zero-field splitting can be much stronger than the electron Zeeman interaction (Bloembergen's original theory of the lanthanide-induced dipolar relaxation process makes the opposite assumption). These factors go beyond the well researched cross-correlation effects; they alter the relaxation theory treatment and make strong angular dependencies appear in the nuclear spin relaxation rates. Those dependencies are impossible to ignore – this is now demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally, and suggests that a major revision is needed of the way lanthanide-induced relaxation data are used in structural biology.

Citation

Suturina, E. A., Mason, K., Geraldes, C. F., Chilton, N. F., Parker, D., & Kuprov, I. (2018). Lanthanide-induced relaxation anisotropy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 20(26), 17676-17686. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp01332b

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jun 6, 2018
• Online Publication Date: Jun 8, 2018
• Publication Date: Jul 14, 2018
• Deposit Date: Jul 18, 2018
• Publicly Available Date: Jul 18, 2018
• Journal: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
• Print ISSN: 1463-9076
• Electronic ISSN: 1463-9084
• Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 26
• Pages: 17676-17686
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp01332b
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1353927