Dr Jeremy Schmidt jeremy.schmidt@durham.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Since 2006, successive Canadian governments have worked to create private property regimes on lands reserved for First Nations. This article examines how the state framed the theory and history of Aboriginal property rights to achieve this goal. It then shows how, under the pretense of restoration, bureaucrats developed legislation that would create novel political spaces where, once converted to private property, reserved lands would function as a new kind of federal municipality in Canada. These changes took place in two ways: First, bureaucrats situated Aboriginal property within the state apparatus and reconfigured Indigenous territorial rights into a series of “regulatory gaps” regarding voting thresholds, certainty of title, and the historical misrepresentation of First Nations economies. Second, the government crafted legislation under what is known as the First Nations Property Ownership Initiative that, by closing regulatory gaps, would produce private property regimes analogous to municipal arrangements elsewhere in Canada. These bureaucratic practices realigned internal state mechanisms to produce novel external boundaries among the state, Indigenous lands, and the economy. By tracking how bureaucratic practices adapted to Indigenous refusals of state agendas, the article shows how the bureaucratic production of territory gave form to a new iteration of settler-colonialism in Canada.
Schmidt, J. J. (2018). Bureaucratic territory: First Nations, private property, and “turn-key” colonialism in Canada. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(4), 901-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1403878
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 1, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 18, 2018 |
Publication Date | Jan 18, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Sep 20, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 18, 2019 |
Journal | Annals of the American Association of Geographers |
Print ISSN | 2469-4452 |
Electronic ISSN | 2469-4460 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 108 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 901-916 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1403878 |
Accepted Journal Article
(296 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of the American Association of Geographers on 18 Jan 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/24694452.2017.1403878.
From Integration to Intersectionality: A Review of Water Ethics
(2023)
Journal Article
Hydrosocial geographies: Cycles, spaces and spheres of concern
(2023)
Journal Article
Earth stewardship, water resilience, and ethics in the Anthropocene
(2023)
Journal Article
Geography and ethics II: Justification and the ethics of anti-oppression
(2023)
Journal Article
Race, Ethnicity, and the Case for Intersectional Water Security
(2023)
Journal Article
About Durham Research Online (DRO)
Administrator e-mail: dro.admin@durham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Advanced Search