Twenty years of ‘Law and Finance’: time to take law seriously
Schnyder, G.; Siems, M.; Aguilera, Ruth
This ‘state of the art’ essay provides a comprehensive discussion of the Law and Finance School (LFS) literature. We show that the first two decades of the LFS have focused on empirically investigating the question ‘does law matter?’ Yet, despite the centrality of law to the LFS, it is based on an incoherent theory of law, which leads to shortcomings in the conceptualization and empirical testing of its hypotheses. We also observe that, rather than addressing this deficiency, the LFS has moved its focus to the contentious concept of ‘legal origin’. We argue that the LFS needs to take law more seriously by returning to its initial focus on the substance of legal rules and by addressing the theoretical question ‘how does law matter?’ We propose venues for future research to develop a solid theoretical framework that would put the empirical investigation of law’s impact on economic outcomes on a more solid footing.
Schnyder, G., Siems, M., & Aguilera, R. (2021). Twenty years of ‘Law and Finance’: time to take law seriously. Socio-Economic Review, 19(1), 377-406. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy041
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Sep 17, 2018|
|Online Publication Date||Nov 2, 2018|
|Deposit Date||Nov 29, 2018|
|Publicly Available Date||Nov 2, 2020|
|Publisher||Oxford University Press|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
Accepted Journal Article
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Socio-Economic Review following peer review. The version of record Schnyder, G., Siems, M. & Aguilera, Ruth (2018). Twenty years of ‘Law and Finance’ time to take law seriously. Socio-Economic Review mwy041 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy041
You might also like
Foreign-trained legal scholars in the UK: ‘irritants’ or ‘change agents’?
The Power of Comparative Law: What Types of Units Can Comparative Law Compare?
The law and ethics of ‘cultural appropriation’
The Illusion of Motion: Corporate (Im)Mobility and the Failed Promise of Centros