Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Camera trap distance sampling for terrestrial mammal population monitoring: lessons learnt from a UK case study

Mason, S.S.; Hill, R.A.; Whittingham, M.J.; Cokill, J.; Smith, G.C.; Stephens, P.A.

Camera trap distance sampling for terrestrial mammal population monitoring: lessons learnt from a UK case study Thumbnail


Authors

Samantha Mason samantha.s.mason@durham.ac.uk
PGR Student Doctor of Philosophy

M.J. Whittingham

J. Cokill

G.C. Smith



Abstract

Accurate and precise density estimates are crucial for effective species management and conservation. However, efficient monitoring of mammal densities over large spatial and temporal scales is challenging. In the United Kingdom, published density estimates for many mammals, including species considered to be common, are imprecise. Camera trap distance sampling (CTDS) can estimate densities of multiple species at a time and has been used successfully in a small number of studies. However, CTDS has typically been used over relatively homogeneous landscapes, often over large time scales, making monitoring changes (by repeating surveys) difficult. In this study, we deployed camera traps at 109 sites across an area of 2725 km2 of varied habitat in North-East England, United Kingdom. The 4-month survey generated 51 447 photos of wild mammal species. Data were sufficient for us to use CTDS to estimate the densities of eight mammal species across the whole-survey area and within four specific habitats. Both survey-wide and habitat-specific density estimates largely fell within previously published density ranges and our estimates were amongst the most precise produced for these species to date. Lower precision for some species was typically due to animals being missed by the camera at certain distances, highlighting the need for careful consideration of practical and methodological decisions, such as how high to set cameras and where to left-truncate data. Although CTDS is a promising methodology for determining densities of multiple species from one survey, species-specific decisions are still required and these cannot always be generalized across species types and locations. Taking the United Kingdom as a case study, our study highlights the potential for CTDS to be used on a national scale, although the scale of the task suggests that it would need to be integrated with a citizen science approach.

Citation

Mason, S., Hill, R., Whittingham, M., Cokill, J., Smith, G., & Stephens, P. (2022). Camera trap distance sampling for terrestrial mammal population monitoring: lessons learnt from a UK case study. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 8(5), 717-730. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.272

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 14, 2022
Online Publication Date May 13, 2022
Publication Date 2022-10
Deposit Date Apr 19, 2022
Publicly Available Date Feb 1, 2023
Journal Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Electronic ISSN 2056-3485
Publisher Wiley Open Access
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 8
Issue 5
Pages 717-730
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.272
Public URL https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1209702

Files

Published Journal Article (1.7 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
ª2022 The Authors. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Zoological Society of London. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.






You might also like



Downloadable Citations