Translating and validating a Japanese version of the instrument for patient assessment of medical professionalism (J-IPAMP): a cross-sectional survey

Fujikawa, H.; Son, D.; Aoki, T.; Kondo, K.; Takemura, Y.; Saito, M.; Den, N.; Eto, M.

Abstract

Background: Although there are many tools to assess medical professionalism, they rarely address patients’ perspectives. The instrument for patient assessment of medical professionalism (IPAMP) comprises 11 items and has been established and validated as a valuable tool for assessing trainees’ professionalism from the patient’s perspective. However, there is no instrument to assess professionalism from the patient’s perspective in Japan. The purpose of the present study was to develop a Japanese version of the IPAMP (J-IPAMP) and test its validity and reliability. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey to examine the reliability and validity of the J-IPAMP in two hospitals (one each in an urban and rural area) in Japan. Receptionists or surveyors distributed the anonymous questionnaire to 276 inpatients; all participants were aged above 20 years and assigned to medical trainees. We evaluated its structural and criterion-related validity, as well as internal consistency reliability. Results: Data of 235 (85.1%) patients were analyzed. Using the split-half validation technique, we performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) along with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA showed a one-factor solution. Then, to compare the model fitness between two models (the two-factor model from the original English version vs. unidimensional model suggested by the EFA), the CFA was performed. The CFA showed that almost all of the fit indices met their respective criteria and were approximately the same for the two models. Thus, we adopted a single-factor model. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the total J-IPAMP scores and the global ratings were 0.738, indicating adequate criterion-related validity. The Cronbach’s alpha of the 11 items of the instrument was 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.96–0.97) and the omega value was 0.96, demonstrating acceptable internal consistency reliability. Conclusions: We developed the Japanese version of the IPAMP. Its validity and reliability were verified through analysis. This instrument can be utilized for professionalism education in the postgraduate training setting.

Citation

Fujikawa, H., Son, D., Aoki, T., Kondo, K., Takemura, Y., Saito, M., Den, N., & Eto, M. (2022). Translating and validating a Japanese version of the instrument for patient assessment of medical professionalism (J-IPAMP): a cross-sectional survey. BMC Medical Education, 22, Article 641. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03699-8

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Aug 16, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Aug 23, 2022
• Publication Date: 2022
• Deposit Date: Aug 24, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: Nov 14, 2022
• Journal: BMC Medical Education
• Publisher: BioMed Central
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 22
• Article Number: 641
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03699-8
• Public URL: https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1193712